<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cluster on Backend Engineering Strategy Tools</title><link>https://backend-engineering-strategy-tools.github.io/site/tags/cluster/</link><description>Recent content in Cluster on Backend Engineering Strategy Tools</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://backend-engineering-strategy-tools.github.io/site/tags/cluster/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Proxmox Cluster in the homelab</title><link>https://backend-engineering-strategy-tools.github.io/site/homelab/proxmox-cluster/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://backend-engineering-strategy-tools.github.io/site/homelab/proxmox-cluster/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Getting a three-node &lt;a class="link" href="https://backend-engineering-strategy-tools.github.io/site/public-notes/cloud-infrastructure/proxmox/" &gt;Proxmox VE&lt;/a&gt; cluster running in the homelab.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The goal is a shared virtualization platform for running VMs and LXC containers across the rack. Also, a good excuse to kick the tires on Proxmox itself so, naturally, let&amp;rsquo;s needlessly complicate things with some self-imposed constraints:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;run it clustered&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;don&amp;rsquo;t use any hardware already earmarked for other projects&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id="hardware"&gt;Hardware
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am going try and use three IBM rack servers from the &lt;a class="link" href="https://backend-engineering-strategy-tools.github.io/site/homelab/inventory/systems/" &gt;inventory&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Asset ID&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Hostname&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Model&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Form Factor&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;RAM&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;CPU&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;SYS-001&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;FREJA&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;IBM System x3550 M1 (7978)&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;1U&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;24GB&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;single&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;SYS-002&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;TYR&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;IBM System x3650 M1 (7979)&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;2U&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;64GB&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;dual&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;SYS-003&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;TOR&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;IBM System x3650 M1 (7979)&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;2U&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;64GB&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;dual&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three nodes satisfies Corosync quorum without needing a &lt;code&gt;qdevice&lt;/code&gt; — losing one node still leaves a majority.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id="installation"&gt;Installation
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In progress.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id="cluster-formation"&gt;Cluster formation
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In progress.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>